Skip to main content

Fair and Balanced

I've been suffering from migraines all week, so I need to keep today's post short and sweet. Last week, I cited studies that found that a liberal bias does exist in American mainstream media.

But was that the whole story?

No, of course not. First of all, there are other kinds of bias out there. Does anyone detect a corporate bias in the media? I do! I'll talk about that sometime soon.

And what about accuracy? A good friend brought this up this week: various outlets may be biased to the left or the right, but which ones are the most accurate in their reporting? Good question! I hope to address that sometime soon too.

But for today, since I'm hurting, I want to simply answer an argument that I came up with myself. (Now that I think about it, arguing with myself might have something to do with my migraines. Hmm.)

Jennifer of last week: There's a liberal media bias. Here's the data, here are my conclusions. Ha! (Drop the mic.)

Jennifer of this week: Yeah, but the studies you cited compared positive or negative coverage of conservatives and liberals . You're not suggesting that journalists have to balance the scale for each individual they cover, right? As in, I wrote two negative articles about Trump so now I have to write two positive articles about Trump?

Good question, Jennifer!

The answer is NO. Journalists are under no obligation to write just as many positive articles as negative ones about a given issue or person. Journalists should simply follow a story where it leads and tell the truth, setting aside their personal opinions when reporting on it. Sometimes that will lead to an unbalanced amount of coverage, either negative or positive.

Sometimes "fair" and "balanced" are not the same thing.

Example #1

When O.J. Simpson was tried for murdering his wife, Nicole Brown, coverage of Simpson, the trial and everything around it was mostly negative. And even though Simpson was eventually acquitted of that crime, most articles I have read on him, his trial and subsequent behavior have been negative.

Is that okay? Yes, that's okay. As long as a journalist shares views from both sides of an issue (such as those from defense attorneys and those from prosecutors, or those from people who believe Simpson is guilty and those who believe he is innocent), she is under no obligation to make sure that the public reads just as many nice things about Simpson as negative things.

Example #2

Many of you may have read about Florida State wide receiver Travis Rudolph who sat with an autistic boy at lunch during a team visit to a Florida middle school this week. It was a sweet story that I personally found very touching (knowing exactly what it's like to have a spectrum child who often ate lunch alone). I don't think anyone would suggest that journalists must cover this story from a negative angle, right?

No, journalists simply must follow a story where it leads, whether that's negative or positive.

So does that negate everything we talked about last week?

No. The studies I cited covered hundreds of news stories spanning many years of coverage. If that many stories covering that many politicians demonstrate a bias, then the bias is real.

But what does that mean for this election season?

Yeah, that's tricky. Because if Donald Trump continues to say controversial things, and if Hillary Clinton continues to avoid the press while the deleted e-mails pile up around her ankles, there might just not be that much positive to say about either of them. When the public overwhelmingly disapproves of both presidential candidates, it may be harder than ever to judge a given article based on its negative or positive treatment of them.

Next week -- if I'm feeling better -- I'll talk about some other ways to identify bias. In the meantime, I'm going back to bed.




Popular posts from this blog

A Fox in the Hen House

When I was a sophomore at Arizona State University, my English teacher assigned a research paper that was a significant part of our grade. I only remember two of the requirements. First, it had to be relevant to my major (journalism). Second, I had to cite reputable, scholarly sources to back up my thesis. When I met with my teacher and told her my idea: American mainstream media demonstrates a liberal bias when reporting the news, she strongly encouraged me to choose another topic. "You won't be able to prove it," she told me. As it turned out, she was wrong. I not only earned an A on my paper, I convinced her I was right.

Now, can I convince you?

I'm not Biased ... YOU Are! 

Let's start with those who see things from the other side of the spectrum...with what is probably the most popular stance on the issue today:

Turn off FOX News!

You've seen this bumper sticker, right? Or one like it. Most of them suggest people who watch FOX News are crazy, stupid, inbre…
To be Fair… I heard a political analyst use this phrase on a news channel this morning. The analyst to his right immediately laughed.
“To be fair?” she scoffed. “How can you pretend your analysis is in any way fair?”
And so it goes.
And doesn’t it feel like this political season is worse than ever?
In a series of posts over the next couple of months, I’m going to attempt to address issues of fairness, truth, accuracy and bias. Why am I qualified to do this? First, I have a degree in journalism and studied media bias extensively during my years at Arizona State University. Second, I am completely and utterly disenchanted with BOTH presidential candidates this year, meaning I’m not inclined to defend either of them. If that doesn’t sell you on my credentials, read on for my incredible insights and be prepared to change your mind!
Is that a Fact? Facts are the first thing I think about when analyzing fairness, truth and bias. We all learned the difference between fact and opinion in elementary…

Truth Lies & Everything in Between: A Propaganda Almanac

When I was in third grade, a family of Vietnamese refugees moved to the small Eastern Washington town where we lived at the time. The family was large and included two school-aged boys, Wa and Him, who started going to our school. Wa was in my class and I wanted to make them all feel welcome, so one day after school, my sister and I walked to their house and knocked on the door. Wa’s family welcomed us inside and gave us watered down Coke to drink. None of them spoke English, but they smiled and nodded at us while we drank our Coke. I don’t remember much else about the experience except that my feelings were all positive, they were super nice and I was glad that our little town had taken in refugees from a war-torn part of the world.
I tell this story to remind you of who I am. To soften you for what I am about to say next. Because I STILL want to accept refugees from war-torn parts of the world. My heart bleeds for them. I pray for them often and just watching the trailer for White He…